Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karl Straub's avatar

I like to guess that for some people, the open marriage thing could work. But if it ain’t working, it ain’t working. Actors talking to the camera can work too, theoretically. But when it flops, it flops pretty definitively.

Anne H.'s avatar

To be a contrarian here (and also speaking as someone who finds the idea of an open marriage baffling): I am always nervous about arguments from nature—in this case, the suggestion that in having an open marriage the letter writer is working against nature. There are lots of things that over time have been deemed natural that we now reject—e.g., women's inferiority to men, some races' inferiority to some other races, the institution of slavery.

Moreover, the question wasn't why she was jealous that another woman wanted to sleep with her husband, it was why she was jealous in this case when she had not been in other cases. If she really was not jealous in other cases, then not everyone is wired the same way, and what is natural for some (or most) is not natural for others. Perhaps for some people open marriages are workable and suitable. Whether they are good for children, society, etc. are other questions.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?